Prompted by Mark Steadman‘s comment on one of my many blog posts on the evils of crossposting, I’ve turned off the tweet digests that were (to be honest) overwhelming the nonsense blog of mine that is /ramblings.
“Whatâ€™s your opinion then of WordPress plugins – like the ones on your own site – that post a digest of your Twitter and del.icio.us activity each day? Thankfully youâ€™re not the kind of guy to tweet that stuff, but isnâ€™t that just the same kind of cross-posting?”
With delicious digests or link dumps I can see added value; the posts give time based (and theme based when you’ve been surfing around a subject) context. This can mean that they mean more when posted to a blog rather than as separate links.
That said if a blog does nothing but republish delicious links then itâ€™s worthless.
The delicious feeds and links that you see on this site are carefully (as much as one does) chosen to be in context â€” and aren’t by any means everything I save. You could subscribe to my entire delicious feed, but unless you’re my mother or my psychiatrist I think you’d be bored (and my mother would be bored anyway). I wouldnâ€™t advise anyone to subscribe to my delicious feed en masse â€” I use it for a wide variety of destinations (as well as to store links for myself); things tagged â€œworkâ€ come here, those tagged â€œbirminghamukâ€ go to BiNS, I occasionally do link collections on a subject, and others links go to other places too.Â Itâ€™s just a mash of my surfing mind, not useful to others.
As for the Twitter digests posts, I can see the point of a post (for your own records as much as anything) but it needs to be carefully positioned so as not to swap the point of your blog. Of course I first set it up â€œbecause I couldâ€, I donâ€™t think I would these days if I hadnâ€™t already.
In fact, I’ve turned it off and switched to archiving to my email, thanks Mark for making me think about that.