They spelt my name wrong, actually prompting me to buy johnbounds.co.uk to point here too, but here is the feature on Midlands Today in which I briefly, er, featured:
Thanks by the way to all those whose Twitter brains I picked beforehand for what to say too.
Nice piece about the BBC's "research mansion", doomed to closure and the dispersal of some incredibly talented people. [link]
Apparently, (I say apparently as the news is mostly coming in from ‘scare’ stories from the papers) ISPs are going to cause trouble if the BBCs catch-up TV service takes up too much of their bandwidth. Mary Turner, CEO of Tiscali UK says, “The internet was not set up with a view to distributing video. We have been improving our capacity, but the bandwidth we have is not infinite”. (quote via the FT).
It’s obvious that a massive (unlikely given how fiddly it is) take up of the VoD services would cause extra internet traffic – but most people in the UK are on capped services, they can’t download (or p2s upload) any more than their quota without paying extra. So extra – and not easily monitored – traffic would be something you’d think that the ISPs would be pleased about.
Until you realise that they have their own IPTV services. That they hope to charge for. Network neutrality anyone?
Niche perhaps, but niche broadcasting is the future – especially when it comes so easily and re-uses content.
Stuck in traffic and about to miss Big Brother I thought – why isn’t the TV on the radio? We could listen to programmes that are already done with audio description (you can find the channels right up the top somewhere if you’ve got Sky) – it’d only cost space on the dial.
Currently there isn’t enough space on FM or MW, but surely it could be squeezed onto DAB.
Blog RSSRSS feed of comments
twitter
flickr
Facebook
You Tube
tumblr
Blog for The Birmingham PostEverything I Do