<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Just good enough&#8221; and why RSS readers might be skip-tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/</link>
	<description>Social web &#38; social media, consultancy, training and advice from a flâneur of the internets. Blogger, writer, broadcaster and runner of Birmingham: It&#039;s Not Shit. I also do the odd bit of art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Flipboard that &#8216;just good enough&#8217; RSS reader? - jon bounds</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Flipboard that &#8216;just good enough&#8217; RSS reader? - jon bounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/?p=901#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>[...] A few posts ago I postulated that for most people, for most types of &#8216;news&#8217; algorithms based around attention and the social graph may well be almost good enough to replace the idea of subscribing to RSS feeds of content directly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few posts ago I postulated that for most people, for most types of &#8216;news&#8217; algorithms based around attention and the social graph may well be almost good enough to replace the idea of subscribing to RSS feeds of content directly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/?p=901#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>You might be correct about the human-readable RSS feeds becoming not read by, errr, humans, but certainly RSS and more likely Atom feeds will become more widely spread in machine-readable forms. It is a great lightweight broadcast-listener solution for distributed and federated environments where state changes need to be distributed. In such and environment we may see the RSS/Atom feed presented in a human-readable form but after a machine transformation of the data (or information) objects perhaps using personalisation or other factors. Linked-data does not usurp the broadcast needs for timely updating in federations and I suspect we will still be using this &quot;good enough&quot; lightweight technology for some time to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be correct about the human-readable RSS feeds becoming not read by, errr, humans, but certainly RSS and more likely Atom feeds will become more widely spread in machine-readable forms. It is a great lightweight broadcast-listener solution for distributed and federated environments where state changes need to be distributed. In such and environment we may see the RSS/Atom feed presented in a human-readable form but after a machine transformation of the data (or information) objects perhaps using personalisation or other factors. Linked-data does not usurp the broadcast needs for timely updating in federations and I suspect we will still be using this &#8220;good enough&#8221; lightweight technology for some time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moxy Park</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Moxy Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/?p=901#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;ve not looked through my RSS reader in a long while, purely because I find skimming through reams of content that doesn&#039;t feel relevant, to be a bit of a wast of time. I get my news from Twitter, and thus my &quot;social circle&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#39;ve not looked through my RSS reader in a long while, purely because I find skimming through reams of content that doesn&#39;t feel relevant, to be a bit of a wast of time. I get my news from Twitter, and thus my &#8220;social circle&#8221; <img src='http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/?p=901#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>You might be correct about the human-readable RSS feeds becoming not read by, errr, humans, but certainly RSS and more likely Atom feeds will become more widely spread in machine-readable forms. It is a great lightweight broadcast-listener solution for distributed and federated environments where state changes need to be distributed. In such and environment we may see the RSS/Atom feed presented in a human-readable form but after a machine transformation of the data (or information) objects perhaps using personalisation or other factors. Linked-data does not usurp the broadcast needs for timely updating in federations and I suspect we will still be using this &quot;good enough&quot; lightweight technology for some time to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be correct about the human-readable RSS feeds becoming not read by, errr, humans, but certainly RSS and more likely Atom feeds will become more widely spread in machine-readable forms. It is a great lightweight broadcast-listener solution for distributed and federated environments where state changes need to be distributed. In such and environment we may see the RSS/Atom feed presented in a human-readable form but after a machine transformation of the data (or information) objects perhaps using personalisation or other factors. Linked-data does not usurp the broadcast needs for timely updating in federations and I suspect we will still be using this &#8220;good enough&#8221; lightweight technology for some time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moxy Park</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/901/just-good-enough-and-why-rss-readers-might-be-skip-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Moxy Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/?p=901#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;ve not looked through my RSS reader in a long while, purely because I find skimming through reams of content that doesn&#039;t feel relevant, to be a bit of a wast of time. I get my news from Twitter, and thus my &quot;social circle&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;ve not looked through my RSS reader in a long while, purely because I find skimming through reams of content that doesn&#8217;t feel relevant, to be a bit of a wast of time. I get my news from Twitter, and thus my &#8220;social circle&#8221; <img src='http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

